相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement - a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools
Stefanie Buehn et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2021)
A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
Hye-Ryeon Kim et al.
HEALTHCARE (2020)
A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool
Robert C. Lorenz et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Minor differences were found between AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS in the assessment of systematic reviews including both randomized and nonrandomized studies
Dawid Pieper et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
The methodological quality of robotic surgical meta-analyses needed to be improved: a cross-sectional study
Peijing Yan et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Meta-Analyses in Plastic Surgery: Can We Trust Their Results?
Connor McGuire et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2019)
Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
Svjetlana Dosenovic et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2018)
How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting
Dawid Pieper et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2018)
The effects of public health policies on health inequalities in high-income countries: an umbrella review
Katie Thomson et al.
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH (2018)
Quality assessment versus risk of bias in systematic reviews: AMSTAR and ROBIS had similar reliability but differed in their construct and applicability
Rita Banzi et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality
Sakshi Sharma et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar
Jinhui Tian et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
Beverley J. Shea et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
Beverley J. Shea et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Michelle Pollock et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2017)
Epidemiology Characteristics, Methodological Assessment and Reporting of Statistical Analysis of Network Meta-Analyses in the Field of Cancer
Long Ge et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2016)
Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties
Dawid Pieper et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Effectiveness of clinical pharmacy services: an overview of systematic reviews (2000-2010)
Inajara Rotta et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY (2015)
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care
Melissa C. Brouwers et al.
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2010)
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Beverley J. Shea et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
Beverley J. Shea et al.
PLOS ONE (2007)
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Beverley J. Shea et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2007)
分享论文
