4.4 Article

Indicators and criteria of consciousness: ethical implications for the care of behaviourally unresponsive patients

期刊

BMC MEDICAL ETHICS
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00770-3

关键词

Consciousness; Disorders of consciousness; Neuroethics; Brain injury; Vegetative state; Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome; Minimally conscious state

资金

  1. Uppsala University
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Program for Research and Innovation [945539]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the application of consciousness indicators in disorders of consciousness through observations of non-human animals and artificial intelligence. These indicators can help identify and assess residual consciousness in patients, providing a theoretical basis for operationalizing and quantifying relevant brain activity.
Background Assessing consciousness in other subjects, particularly in non-verbal and behaviourally disabled subjects (e.g., patients with disorders of consciousness), is notoriously challenging but increasingly urgent. The high rate of misdiagnosis among disorders of consciousness raises the need for new perspectives in order to inspire new technical and clinical approaches. Main body We take as a starting point a recently introduced list of operational indicators of consciousness that facilitates its recognition in challenging cases like non-human animals and Artificial Intelligence to explore their relevance to disorders of consciousness and their potential ethical impact on the diagnosis and healthcare of relevant patients. Indicators of consciousness mean particular capacities that can be deduced from observing the behaviour or cognitive performance of the subject in question (or from neural correlates of such performance) and that do not define a hard threshold in deciding about the presence of consciousness, but can be used to infer a graded measure based on the consistency amongst the different indicators. The indicators of consciousness under consideration offer a potential useful strategy for identifying and assessing residual consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness, setting the theoretical stage for an operationalization and quantification of relevant brain activity. Conclusions Our heuristic analysis supports the conclusion that the application of the identified indicators of consciousness to its disorders will likely inspire new strategies for assessing three very urgent issues: the misdiagnosis of disorders of consciousness; the need for a gold standard in detecting consciousness and diagnosing its disorders; and the need for a refined taxonomy of disorders of consciousness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据