4.6 Article

Plant-based diet index and erectile dysfunction in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 130, 期 4, 页码 514-521

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bju.15765

关键词

plant-based diet; erectile dysfunction; health professionals follow-up study; men's health; andrology

资金

  1. SM (Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital) [1K12DK111028]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Disorders
  3. Tricia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that a healthy plant-based diet is inversely associated with incident ED in men aged 60 to <70 years, while an unhealthy plant-based diet is positively associated with ED in men aged <60 years.
Objective To evaluate the longitudinal association between plant-based diet index (PDI) score and incident erectile dysfunction (ED). Materials and Methods We conducted a prospective analysis of 21 942 men aged 40 to 75 years who were enrolled in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. ED was assessed with questionnaires every 4 years starting in 2000. Dietary data were collected via validated food frequency questionnaires completed every 4 years and were used to calculate total PDI scores, as well as healthy (hPDI) and unhealthy (uPDI) subscores. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) for incident ED. All models were stratified by age (<60, 60 to <70, >= 70 years). Results Among men aged 60 to <70 years, hPDI was inversely associated with incident ED. Those in the highest quintile of hPDI in that age group had an 18% lower risk of ED (HR 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.91; P-trend <0.001) compared to those in the lowest quintile. Conversely, uPDI was positively associated with ED in men aged <60 years (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.60; P-trend = 0.02). Conclusions Encouraging a healthy plant-based diet may be an environmentally sustainable intervention for men interested in maintaining erectile function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据