4.3 Article

Efficient immobilized phospholipase A1 on Mo-basing nanomaterials for enzymatic degumming

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.3256

关键词

enzymatic degumming; hydrolysis; immobilization; phospholipase A(1); phospholipids

资金

  1. Key Research and Invention Program in Shaanxi Province of China [2018NY-131, 2020NY-127]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars [22108227, 52101230]
  3. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Special Fuel Chemistry and Material [SPCF-SKL-2021-0004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Six kinds of Mo-basing nanomaterials were synthesized and employed as carriers to immobilize PLA1 for the hydrolysis of PLs. MoO3 was confirmed to be the best candidate for carrier, showing higher catalytic activity and enzyme-substrate affinity.
Six kinds of Mo-basing nanomaterials (MoO3, MoO3@Ru, Mo-PDA, MoP(R), MoP, CNT@MoS2) were successfully synthesized, which were employed as carriers to immobilize phospholipase A(1) (PLA1) for the hydrolysis of phospholipids (PLs). PLA1 was immobilized by a simple adsorption-precipitation-cross-linking to form an enzyme net covering on nanoparticles. The greatest advantage of these nanoparticles was their strong hydrophilic surface. It not only permitted their dispersion in the aqueous phase, but also showed the strong affinity for PLs in the organic phase, because amphiphilic PLs had the polar head group and higher hydrophilicity than other oils components. Michaelis-Menten analysis revealed that higher catalytic activity and enzyme-substrate affinity were observed in several immobilized PLA1 than its free form. MoO3 was confirmed to be the best candidate for carrier. The highest specific activity of MoO3-immobilized PLA1 reached 43.1 U/mg, which was about 1.8 times higher than that of free PLA1 (24.4 U/mg). In addition, the stability and recycling were also enhanced. The robust immobilized PLA1 was prepared in this work, showing great potential for the enzymatic degumming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据