4.8 Article

The absolute concentration and bioavailability of trace elements: Two vital parameters affecting anaerobic digestion performance of chicken manure leachate

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 350, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126909

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; Trace elements; EDTA-Na-2; Chicken manure leachate; Bioavailability

资金

  1. Federal Ministry for Economic Af-fairs and Climate Action (BMWK) [03 KB137]
  2. startup research fund of Zhengzhou University [201806350287]
  3. German academic exchange center (DAAD)
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the bioavailability of trace elements (TEs) and the effect of supplementation on anaerobic digestion of chicken manure leachate. The results showed low bioavailability of certain TEs, but supplementation improved their bioavailability and methane production efficiency. Scrutinizing the bioavailability and absolute concentrations of available TEs is critical for assessing the risk of TEs deficiency.
It is currently unclear whether trace elements (TEs) deficiency is due to low bioavailability or low absolute TEs concentrations, especially in high-pH anaerobic digestion (AD) systems. A mixed solution of TEs and EDTA-Na-2 were used separately in mono-AD of chicken manure (CM) leachate to investigate this research gap. The results showed relatively low bioavailability of Fe, Mn, and Zn. The bioavailability of all TEs remained stable along with a gradual increase in total ammonia nitrogen concentration. Both TE and EDTA-Na-2 supplementation improved the bioavailability of TEs, but TEs supplementation also gave a high proportion of soluble TEs. Adding TEs improved methane production efficiency (+38.3%) and decreased the H2S content. The exchangeable fraction of specific TE (Mo) in H-2/CO2 pathway was higher in the TEs treatment. TEs bioavailability and absolute concentrations of available TEs are critical aspects that need to be scrutinized to assess the risk of TEs deficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据