4.8 Article

Distinctive correlations between cell concentration and cell size to microalgae biomass under increasing carbon dioxide

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 347, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126733

关键词

Pearson correlation; Cell concentration; Cell size; Microalgae biomass dry weight; Carbon dioxide

资金

  1. Monash University Malaysia Sus-tainable Community Grant Scheme [SDG-2018-04-SCI]
  2. Global leadership and advanced research program [GLARP-2019-5040100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microalgae species, Chlorella and Chlamydomonas, showed increased biomass concentration under elevated CO2 levels due to their cell concentrations, while Chlorella and Nostoc exhibited enhanced cell sizes at high CO2 concentrations. These findings provide new insights for designing carbon capture and storage schemes and biochemical production.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) via microalgae cultivations is getting renewed interest as climate change mitigation effort, owing to its excellent photosynthetic and CO2 fixation capability. Microalgae growth is monitored based on their biomass, cell concentrations and cell sizes. The key parametric relationships on microalgae growth under CO2 are absent in previous studies and this inadequacy hampers the design and scale-up of microalgae-based CCS. In this study, three representative microalgae species, Chlorella, Nostoc and Chlamydomonas, were investigated for establishing key correlations of cell concentrations and sizes towards their biomass fluctuations under CO2 influences of 0% to 20% volume ratios (v/v). This revealed that Chlorella and Chlamydomonas cell concentrations significantly contributed towards increasing biomass concentration under CO2 elevations. Chlorella and Nostoc cell sizes were enhanced at 20% (v/v). These findings provided new perspectives on growth responses under increasing CO2 treatment, opening new avenues on CCS schemes engineering designs and biochemical production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据