4.8 Article

Coproduction of xylooligosaccharides and monosaccharides from hardwood by a combination of acetic acid pretreatment, mechanical refining and enzymatic hydrolysis

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 358, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127365

关键词

Poplar; Acetic acid pretreatment; PFI refining; Xylooligosaccharides; Monosaccharides

资金

  1. National Key Research and Develop-ment Program of China [2019YFB1503803]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution (PAPD) [BK20200797]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province for Youth
  4. National Firstclass Disciplines (PNFD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sequential biorefinery treatments can efficiently co-produce xylooligosaccharides and fermentable monosaccharides from wood, with potential for improving production efficiency through optimized pretreatment methods and enhanced substrate digestibility.
Sequential biorefinery treatments of acetic acid (HAC) pretreatment, Papir Forsknings Institutet (PFI) milling and enzymatic hydrolysis were demonstrated for coproduction of xylooligosaccharides (XOS) and fermentable monosaccharides. Results indicated that 36.2% XOS (50.8% X2-X3) and 17.0% low DP xylans were achieved using a HAC pretreatment with a combined severity factor of 0.78. The HAC pretreatment resulted in a XOS-rich prehydrolyzate with a low molecular weight of 1.28 kDa. The endo-xylanase hydrolysis was conducted on the pretreatment liquor to elevate XOS yield and the content of higher-value X2-X3. Moreover, fermentable glucose production from the pretreated residue increased by 2.3 folds when introducing an additional step of PFI refining prior to enzymatic digestion. Properties of substrate including cellulose accessibility, crystallite size, crystalline index and water retention value were in close relationships with enzymatic digestibility. The implementation of proposed biorefinery process will give more insights into the efficient construction of a wood-derived sugar platform.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据