4.8 Article

Techno-economic evaluation and life cycle assessment of a biorefinery using winery waste streams for the production of succinic acid and value-added co-products

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 348, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126295

关键词

Grape pomace; Grape stalks; Wine lees; Biorefinery; Sustainability analysis

资金

  1. project INVALOR: Research Infrastructure for Waste Valorization and Sustainable Management - Operational Programme Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation (NSRF 2014-2020) [MIS 5002495]
  2. European Union (European Regional Development Fund)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a techno-economic evaluation and life cycle assessment of a novel biorefinery that utilizes waste streams generated by wineries to produce bio-based succinic acid, crude phenolic-rich extract, grape-seed oil, calcium tartrate, and crude tannin-rich extract. The research shows that this biorefinery has the potential to develop a sustainable and efficient waste management system.
This study presents techno-economic evaluation and life cycle assessment of a novel biorefinery using the three main waste streams generated by wineries for the production of bio-based succinic acid (SA), crude phenolic-rich extract, grape-seed oil, calcium tartrate and crude tannin-rich extract. Process design has been employed for the estimation of material and energy balances and the sizing of unit operations. The Minimum Selling Price of succinic acid production within a winery waste biorefinery ranges from $1.23-2.76/kg(SA) depending on the market price and the potential end-uses of the extracted fractions. The Global Warming Potential and the Abiotic Depletion Potential of winery waste valorisation through the proposed biorefinery are 1.47 kg CO2-eq per kg dry waste and 25.2 MJ per kg dry waste, respectively. Biorefining of winery waste could lead to the development of a sustainable and novel bioeconomy business model with new market opportunities and efficient waste management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据