4.8 Review

A critical review of process parameters influencing the fate of antibiotic resistance genes in the anaerobic digestion of organic waste

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 354, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127189

关键词

Antibiotics; Emerging contaminants; Digestate; Mobile genetic elements

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship
  3. Alberta Innovates Graduate Student Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The overuse and inappropriate disposal of antibiotics pose significant public health risks worldwide, particularly in regard to the propagation of antibiotic-resistant genes during anaerobic digestion. Understanding the influences of process parameters is crucial for studying the transmission of antibiotic-resistant genes in this process.
The overuse and inappropriate disposal of antibiotics raised severe public health risks worldwide. Specifically, the incomplete antibiotics metabolism in human and animal bodies contributes to the significant release of antibiotics into the natural ecosystems and the proliferation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria carrying antibiotic resistant genes. Moreover, the organic feedstocks used for anaerobic digestion are often highly-rich in residual antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant genes. Hence, understanding their fate during anaerobic digestion has become a significant research focus recently. Previous studies demonstrated that various process parameters could considerably influence the propagation of the antibiotic-resistant genes during anaerobic digestion and their transmission via land application of digestate. This review article scrutinizes the influences of process parameters on antibiotic-resistant genes propagation in anaerobic digestion and the inherent fundamentals behind their effects. Based on the literature review, critical research gaps and challenges are summarized to guide the prospects for future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据