4.8 Article

Role of nitrogen transport for efficient energy conversion potential in low carbon and high nitrogen/phosphorus wastewater by microalgal-bacterial system

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 351, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127019

关键词

Microalgae-bacteria interaction; Extracellular polymeric substances; Nitrogen transport; Starch synthesis; Energy conversion

资金

  1. National Key Research and Devel-opment Program [2019YFC0408503]
  2. Project of Thousand Youth Talents [AUGA2160100917]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microalgal-bacterial system (MBS) has the potential for efficient wastewater treatment and energy production. This study discovered that MBS can enhance the adsorption and transport of nitrogen through electrical neutralization and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). The interaction between microalgae and bacteria accelerates the removal of nitrogen from aqueous solutions.
Microalgal-bacterial system (MBS) is potential biotechnology in wastewater treatment because it can remedy defects of conventional processes (e.g., insufficient carbon source and imbalanced elements ratio). However, the mechanisms of nitrogen (N) transport and removal in MBS are still unclear. In this study, it was discovered that MBS was conducive to adsorb NH4+-N and NO3--N through electrical neutralization, while extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) could provide binding sites (e.g., -OH and -CH3) for enhancing N transport and removal. The microalgae-bacteria interaction could accelerate N transport and removal from aqueous solution to cell. More importantly, the microalgal starch biosynthetic metabolism exhibited demonstrating the energy production potential could be boosted via MBS. Overall, the NO3--N and NH4+-N removal efficiencies, and energy yield were 82.28%, 94.15%, and 86.81 kJ/L, respectively, which are better than other relevant studies. Altogether, it is meaningful for revealing the applicability of MBS for treating wastewater and producing energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据