4.7 Article

Preparation of cyclohexanol from lignin-based phenolic concoction using controlled hydrogen delivery tool over in-situ Ru catalyst

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 161, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106448

关键词

Lignin; Hydrodeoxygenation; Hydrogenation; Cyclohexanol; In situ catalyst; Selectivity

资金

  1. CSIR, New Delhi [OLP-0031, CSC-0123]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigated the hydrodeoxygenation-hydrogenation of lignin-based methoxyphenols to cyclohexanol using an in situ generated Ru(0)@Mg(OH)(2) catalyst in aqueous medium. The active catalyst Ru(0)@Mg(OH)(2) was generated from hydrous ruthenium oxide (HRO)/Mg(OH)(2) under reaction conditions. Controlled addition of H-2 at a constant temperature improved the selectivity of cyclohexanol compared to the conventional batch mode process. Complete conversion of methoxyphenols with high selectivity for cyclohexanol was achieved under relatively milder reaction conditions. The method and catalyst reported in this work are also effective for lignin-derived phenolic concoction.
This work investigated hydrodeoxygenation-hydrogenation of lignin-based methoxyphenols (obtained through hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of lignin) to cyclohexanol in high yields over in situ generated Ru(0)@Mg(OH)(2) catalyst in aqueous medium. The active catalyst Ru(0)@Mg(OH)(2) is generated in situ from hydrous ruthenium oxide (HRO)/Mg(OH)(2) under reaction conditions, as confirmed by various physiochemical techniques. Continuous and controlled addition of H-2 at constant temperature facilitated in improving the selectivity of cyclohexanol compared to the conventional batch mode (pre-set pressure) process. Complete conversion of methoxyphenols with 93-99% selectivity for cyclohexanol was achieved at 10 mL/min H-2 flow under comparatively milder reaction conditions. The adopted procedure and the in situ catalyst reported in this work is also effective for lignin-derived phenolic concoction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据