4.7 Article

DFBP: a comprehensive database of food-derived bioactive peptides for peptidomics research

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 38, 期 12, 页码 3275-3280

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac323

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32172196, 31771975, 31571782]
  2. NSF [2107619]
  3. University of Akron
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China [CSTC2019JCYJMSXMX0527]
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [2107619] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study constructed a database of 6276 food-derived bioactive peptides from different sources and developed a series of analysis tools for studying their function, traceability, multifunctionality, and physicochemical properties. The study also discovered new food-derived bioactive peptides that have potential as drugs for cardiovascular diseases.
Motivation: Food-derived bioactive peptides (FBPs) have demonstrated their significance in pharmaceuticals, diets and nutraceuticals, benefiting public health and global ecology. While significant efforts have been made to discover FBPs and to elucidate the underlying bioactivity mechanisms, there is lack of a systemic study of sequence-structure-activity relationship of FBPs in a large dataset. Results: Here, we construct a database of food-derived bioactive peptides (DFBP), containing a total of 6276 peptide entries in 31 types from different sources. Further, we develop a series of analysis tools for function discovery/repurposing, traceability, multifunctional bioactive exploration and physiochemical property assessment of peptides. Finally, we apply this database and data-mining techniques to discover new FBPs as potential drugs for cardiovascular diseases. The DFBP serves as a useful platform for not only the fundamental understanding of sequence-structure-activity of FBPs but also the design, discovery, and repurposing of peptide-based drugs, vaccines, materials and food ingredients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据