4.7 Article

Enhanced CO2 electroconversion of Rhodobacter sphaeroides by cobalt-phosphate complex assisted water oxidation

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2022.108102

关键词

CO 2 electroconversion; Cobalt-phosphate; Water oxidation; Microbial electrosynthesis; Rhodobacter sphaeroides

资金

  1. Research and Development Program of Korea Institute of Energy Research [KIER-C2-2432]
  2. RAMP
  3. D Innovation cluster of the Republic of Korea [2021-DD-RD-0033]
  4. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) [2021003240005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CO2 can be converted into organic acids and carotenoids by photoautotrophic bacteria in the MES reactor. Introducing cobalt-phosphate-assisted water oxidation at the anode can improve the performance of MES.
CO2 can be a next generation feedstock for electricity-driven bioproduction due to its abundance and availability. Microbial electrosynthesis (MES), a promising technique for CO2 electroconversion, provides an attractive route for the production of valuable products from CO2, but issues surrounding efficiency and reasonable productivity should be resolved. Improving the anode performance for water oxidation under neutral pH is one of the most important aspects to advance current MES. Here, we introduce cobalt-phosphate (Co-Pi) assisted water oxidation at the counter electrode (i.e., anode) to upgrade the MES performance at pH 7.0. We show that CO2 can be converted by photochemoautotrophic bacterium, Rhodobacter sphaeroides into organic acids and carotenoids in the MES reactor. Planktonic cells of R. sphareroides in the Co-Pi anode equipped MES reactor was ca. 1.5-fold higher than in the control condition (w/o Co-Pi). The faradaic efficiency of the Co-Pi anode equipped MES reactor was remarkably higher (58.3%) than that of the bare anode (27.8%). While the system can improve the CO2 electroconversion nonetheless there are some further optimizations are necessary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据