4.6 Article

Effect of high antioxidant activity on bacteriostasis of lignin from sugarcane bagasse

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2022.108335

关键词

Lignin fractionation; Phenolic hydroxyl; Antioxidant activity; Antibacterial activity; Cell membrane integrity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22168020, 21766014]
  2. In-ternational Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation Program of the State Key Research and Development Program [2021YFE0114400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, alkali treated lignin (KL) and dilute acid-alkali treated lignin (DAKL) were prepared and compared for their functional groups, antioxidant and antibacterial activity. DAKL showed smaller molecular weight, higher purity, and better antioxidant and antibacterial effects.
Lignin is widely used as an alternative to fossil resources in industrial production. However, its applications are limited due to its wide molecular weight distribution and chemical heterogeneity. In this study, alkali treated lignin (KL) and dilute acid-alkali treated lignin (DAKL) were prepared and compared through analyzing the functional groups, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of lignin. The results showed that DAKL displayed a smaller weight-average molecular weight (756 g/mol) and higher purity (93.74%). Further results showed that high contents of phenolic, syringyl (S), and guaiacyl (G) in DAKL increased its antioxidant activity (IC50: 38.5 mu g/ mL). Furthermore, DAKL exhibited a more excellent antibacterial effect on Staphylococcus aureus (96.71%) and Escherichia coli (100%) due to (1) the presence of several phenolic substances in lignin that damaged and ruptured the bacterial cell membrane, causing leakage of cell contents and bacterial death and (2) small molecule weight of lignin that allow it to penetrate the bacterial cell membrane, changing the physiological conditions of bacterial cell fluid and leading to cell death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据