4.6 Article

IL-6 protects cardiomyocytes from oxidative stress at the early stage of LPS-induced sepsis

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.03.013

关键词

IL-6; Nrf2; Oxidative stress; Sepsis; Cardiac injury

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20191324]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [82100309]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2632020YX01]
  4. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines [SKLNMKF202102]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the crucial role of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) in sepsis-induced cardiac injury and its function as an antioxidant molecule via activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway.
Pro-inflammatory cytokines play important roles in sepsis-induced cardiac injury. Among various cytokines, the function of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the regulation of cardiomyocyte injury remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to investigate whether IL-6 plays a key role in the sepsis-induced cardiomyocyte injury and the possible mechanism. Mice deficient for Il-6 exhibited impaired heart rhythm after LPS stimulation. Histological analysis revealed significantly increased oxidative stress after LPS stimulation in the heart with Il-6 knockout. On the contrary, IL-6 supplementation alleviated LPS-induced oxidative stress. Mechanically, IL-6 facilitates Nrf2 expression and its nucleus translocation, which subsequently promotes the expression of antioxidant genes and sustains redox homeostasis in cardiomyocytes, and Nrf2 deletion results in elevated oxidative stress during LPS stimulation and cannot be inverted by IL-6 supplement. Our study presents a new sight for the protective role of IL-6 during the pathological development of LPS-induced cardiac injury, which functions as an anti-oxidant molecule via activating Nrf2 signaling. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据