4.7 Article

Almost global attitude stabilisation of an underactuated axially symmetric 3-D pendulum

期刊

AUTOMATICA
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2021.110110

关键词

Attitude control; 3-D spherical pendulum; Stabilisation; Nonlinear control systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the problem of stabilizing the attitude of an axially symmetric 3-D pendulum. The presence of a topological obstruction and the underactuation of the system pose challenges to global stabilization. To address these challenges, the paper proposes a family of smooth feedback laws that achieve almost-global stabilization with a polynomial convergence rate, and defines a second family of feedback laws that induce almost global exponential stabilization.
We investigate the problem of stabilising the attitude of an axially symmetric 3-D pendulum. The system is assumed to be actuated by two torques acting orthogonally to the symmetry axis. In the process of stabilising the system, two main difficulties are encountered: first, the presence of a well-known topological obstruction to the global stabilisation by means of continuous feedback laws, and second, the fact that the linearised system around the target equilibrium is not controllable due to the strong underactuation of the system. To cope with the first issue, in this paper we look for feedback laws capable of stabilising the system starting from almost all initial conditions. The second issue entails the impossibility of stabilising the system exponentially by means of a smooth feedback. The contributions of this paper are (1) to propose a family of smooth feedback laws capable of almost-globally stabilising the system with a polynomial rate of convergence, and (2) to define a second family of feedback laws presenting a discontinuity at the target attitude configuration and continuous elsewhere inducing almost global exponential stabilisation. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据