4.7 Article

Robust formation control for networked robotic systems using Negative Imaginary dynamics

期刊

AUTOMATICA
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110235

关键词

Multi-robot systems; Swarm robotics; Negative Imaginary systems; Fault-tolerant control; Robustness

资金

  1. EU [964492]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK [EP/R026084/1, EP/P01366X/1]
  3. Royal Academy of Engineering, UK [CiET1819]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a consensus-based formation tracking scheme for multi-robot systems utilizing the Negative Imaginary (NI) theory. The proposed scheme applies to networked robotic systems that consist of single integrator agents with stable uncertainties connected via an undirected graph. It offers robustness to model uncertainties and fault-tolerance to a sudden loss of robots.
This paper proposes a consensus-based formation tracking scheme for multi-robot systems utilizing the Negative Imaginary (NI) theory. The proposed scheme applies to a class of networked robotic systems that can be modelled as a group of single integrator agents with stable uncertainties connected via an undirected graph. NI/SNI property of networked agents facilitates the design of a distributed Strictly Negative Imaginary (SNI) controller to achieve the desired formation tracking. A new theoretical proof of asymptotic convergence of the formation tracking trajectories is derived based on the integral controllability of a networked SNI systems. The proposed scheme is an alternative to the conventional Lyapunov-based formation tracking schemes. It offers robustness to NI/SNI-type model uncertainties and fault-tolerance to a sudden loss of robots due to hardware/communication fault. The feasibility and usefulness of the proposed formation tracking scheme were validated by lab-based real-time hardware experiments involving miniature mobile robots.(C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据