4.0 Review

Understanding Australia's unique hopping species: a comparative review of the musculoskeletal system and locomotor biomechanics in Macropodoidea

期刊

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 136-157

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/ZO21048

关键词

bone; efficiency; gait; locomotion; macropod; muscle; saltation; tendon

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kangaroos and other macropodoids exhibit differences in the scaling of their musculoskeletal systems, influenced by phylogenetic context. Despite the trade-offs limiting locomotor performance in macropodoids, particularly in the hopping gait, energetics, and stresses in the musculoskeletal system, the biomechanical factors behind the energy efficiency of large kangaroos remain unclear. Further research is needed to fill these gaps.
Kangaroos and other macropodoids stand out among mammals for their unusual hopping locomotion and body shape. This review examines the scaling of hind- and forelimb bones, and the primary ankle extensor muscles and tendons. We find that the scaling of the musculoskeletal system is sensitive to the phylogenetic context. Tibia length increases with positive allometry among most macropodoids, but negative allometry in eastern grey kangaroos and isometry in red kangaroos. Femur length decreases with stronger negative allometry in eastern grey and red kangaroos than among other macropodoids. Muscle masses scale with negative allometry in western grey kangaroos and with isometry in red kangaroos, compared to positive allometry in other macropodoids. We further summarise the work on the hopping gait, energetics in macropodoids, and stresses in the musculoskeletal system in an evolutionary context, to determine what trade-offs may limit locomotor performance in macropodoids. When large kangaroos hop, they do not increase oxygen consumption with speed, unlike most mammals, including small hopping species. We conclude that there is not enough information to isolate the biomechanical factors that make large kangaroos so energy efficient. We identify key areas for further research to fill these gaps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据