4.2 Article

The healthiness of New Zealand school food environments: a national survey

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.13210

关键词

School food; food environment; obesity prevention; food policy

资金

  1. University of Auckland Doctoral Scholarship
  2. Health Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the healthiness of New Zealand school food environments and finds that school nutrition policies are weak, and canteen and fundraising items are largely unhealthy, which undermine other positive efforts. The study provides evidence of unhealthy school food environments and supports the need for stronger national-level policy.
Objective: To evaluate the healthiness of New Zealand school food environments. Methods: In 2016, primary and secondary schools were invited to complete a cross-sectional questionnaire. School nutrition policies were analysed using an adapted Wellness School Assessment Tool. Canteen menus were analysed using the National Food and Beverage Classification System, and a sample of menus (n=54) were validated using fieldworker observations. Results: In total, 819 schools (response rate 33%) participated. Forty per cent had a nutrition policy, and those analysed (n=145) lacked comprehensiveness and contained weak statements. Seventy-one per cent sold food and beverages during the school day. The school food service offered mainly unhealthy items. Many schools (81%) used food and beverages for fundraising with 90% of them using 'less healthy' items. Most had vegetable gardens (80%), included nutrition education in the curriculum (90%), were not sponsored by food and beverage companies (94%) and did not have commercial advertising on school grounds (97%). Conclusion: New Zealand school nutrition policies are weak, and canteen and fundraising items are largely unhealthy, which undermine other positive efforts. Implications for public health: This study provides evidence of unhealthy school food environments and supports the need for stronger national-level policy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据