4.6 Article

Precursors of the RNA World in Space: Detection of (Z)-1,2-ethenediol in the Interstellar Medium, a Key Intermediate in Sugar Formation

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 929, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6186

关键词

-

资金

  1. INSU/CNRS (France)
  2. MPG (Germany)
  3. IGN (Spain)
  4. Comunidad de Madrid through the Atraccion de Talento Investigador (Doctores con experiencia) Grant (COOL: Cosmic Origins Of Life) [2019-T1/TIC-15379]
  5. Unidad de Excelencia Maria de Maeztu-Centro de Astrobiologia, INTA-CSIC [PID2019-105552RB-C41, MDM-2017-0737]
  6. MCIN/AEI [MDM-2017-0737-19-2, PRE2019-091471]
  7. ESF Investing in your future
  8. European Research Council through Synergy Grant ERC-2013-SyG [610256]
  9. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICIU) [PID2019-107115GB-C21]
  10. Spanish MICIU [PID2019-106235GB-I00]
  11. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the first detection of (Z)-1,2-ethenediol, the enol form of glycolaldehyde, in a molecular cloud near the Galactic Center. The molecular abundance with respect to molecular hydrogen is determined, and the possible formation routes and its relation to glyceraldehyde are discussed.
We present the first detection of (Z)-1,2-ethenediol, (CHOH)(2), the enol form of glycolaldehyde, in the interstellar medium toward the G+0.693-0.027 molecular cloud located in the Galactic Center. We have derived a column density of (1.8 +/- 0.1) x 10(13) cm(-2), which translates into a molecular abundance with respect to molecular hydrogen of 1.3 x 10(-10). The abundance ratio between glycolaldehyde and (Z)-1,2-ethenediol is similar to 5.2. We discuss several viable formation routes through chemical reactions from precursors such as HCO, H2CO, CHOH, or CH2CHOH. We also propose that this species might be an important precursor in the formation of glyceraldehyde (HOCH2CHOHCHO) in the interstellar medium through combination with the hydroxymethylene (CHOH) radical.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据