4.7 Article

On the Stellar Populations of Galaxies at z=9-11: The Growth of Metals and Stellar Mass at Early Times

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 927, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4cad

关键词

-

资金

  1. Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory through the CfA Fellowship
  2. UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science Technology) [1.210134.01]
  3. NASA through ADAP [80NSSC18K0954]
  4. Amaldi Research Center - MIUR program Dipartimento di Eccellenza [CUP: B81I18001170001]
  5. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  6. Hubble Space Telescope program [15862]
  7. Space Telescope Science Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted a detailed stellar population analysis of 11 bright galaxies at z = 9-11 and used a flexible Bayesian spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting code to study their chemical enrichment and growth of stellar mass. Our results show the impact of different priors on the analysis and how well we can break degeneracies between various parameters using only UV to optical wavelength data. The correlation between dust attenuation, stellar ages, metallicity, and emission lines was explored using this approach.
We present a detailed stellar population analysis of 11 bright (H < 26.6) galaxies at z = 9-11 (three spectroscopically confirmed) to constrain the chemical enrichment and growth of stellar mass of early galaxies. We use the flexible Bayesian spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting code Prospector with a range of star formation histories (SFHs), a flexible dust attenuation law, and a self-consistent model of emission lines. This approach allows us to assess how different priors affect our results and how well we can break degeneracies between dust attenuation, stellar ages, metallicity, and emission lines using data that probe only the rest-frame ultraviolet (UV) to optical wavelengths. We measure a median observed UV spectral slope beta=-1.87(-0.43)(+0.35) for relatively massive star-forming galaxies (9 10.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据