4.7 Article

Influence of the Heliospheric Current Sheet on the Evolution of Solar Wind Turbulence

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 928, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac558b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ACI-1548562]
  2. NASA HERMES DRIVE Science Center [80NSSC20K0604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the effects of the heliospheric current sheet on the evolution of Alfvenic turbulence in the solar wind were investigated using MHD simulations and data analysis. The results showed a decrease in the Alfvenicity of the turbulence near the heliospheric current sheet, accompanied by an increase in magnetic energy excess. The simulations and data analysis supported each other, revealing that the weakening of the radial magnetic field and the effects of the transverse gradient in the background magnetic field were responsible for the decrease in Alfvenicity and the magnetic energy excess.
The effects of the heliospheric current sheet (HCS) on the evolution of Alfvenic turbulence in the solar wind are studied using MHD simulations incorporating the expanding-box model. The simulations show that, near the HCS, the Alfvenicity of the turbulence decreases as manifested by lower normalized cross-helicity and larger excess of magnetic energy. The numerical results are supported by a superposed-epoch analysis using OMNI data, which shows that the normalized cross-helicity decreases inside the plasma sheet surrounding HCS, and the excess of magnetic energy is significantly enhanced at the center of HCS. Our simulation results indicate that the decrease of Alfvenicity around the HCS is due to the weakening of radial magnetic field and the effects of the transverse gradient in the background magnetic field. The magnetic energy excess in the turbulence may be a result of the loss of Alfvenic correlation between velocity and magnetic field and the faster decay of transverse kinetic energy with respect to magnetic energy in a spherically expanding solar wind.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据