4.6 Article

Systematic KMTNet planetary anomaly search V. Complete sample of 2018 prime-field

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 664, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243744

关键词

gravitational lensing; micro; planets and satellites; detection

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A4A2002885, 2019R1A2C2085965]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [12133005]
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [JSPS24253004, JSPS26247023, JSPS23340064, JSPS15H00781, JP16H06287, JP17H02871]
  4. NASA [NNG16PJ32C, 18-NUP2018-0016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the prime-field microlensing planets identified by the Korea Microlensing Telescope Network (KMTNet) Anomaly Finder in 2018. It identifies eight events with clear planetary solutions and lays the groundwork for further research on the planet mass-ratio function.
We complete the analysis of all 2018 prime-field microlensing planets identified by the Korea Microlensing Telescope Network (KMTNet) Anomaly Finder. Among the ten previously unpublished events with clear planetary solutions, eight are either unambiguously planetary or are very likely to be planetary in nature: OGLE-2018-BLG-1126, KMT-2018-BLG-2004, OGLE-2018-BLG-1647, OGLE-2018-BLG-1367, OGLE-2018-BLG-1544, OGLE-2018-BLG-0932, OGLE-2018-BLG-1212, and KMT-2018-BLG-2718. Combined with the four previously published new Anomaly Finder events and 12 previously published (or in preparation) planets that were discovered by eye, this makes a total of 24 2018 prime-field planets discovered or recovered by Anomaly Finder. Together with a paper in preparation on 2018 subprime planets, this work lays the basis for the first statistical analysis of the planet mass-ratio function based on planets identified in KMTNet data. By systematically applying the heuristic analysis to each event, we identified the small modification in their formalism that is needed to unify the so-called close-wide and inner-outer degeneracies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据