4.8 Article

Membrane vesicles in sea water: heterogeneous DNA content and implications for viral abundance estimates

期刊

ISME JOURNAL
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 394-404

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2016.134

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [OCE-1356460]
  2. Simons Foundation [337262, 329108]
  3. NASA [NNX14AP62A, NOPP RFP NOAA-NOS-IOOS-2014-2003803]
  4. NOAA
  5. BOEM
  6. NASA
  7. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1456301] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  10. Directorate For Geosciences [1356460] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diverse microbes release membrane-bound extracellular vesicles from their outer surfaces into the surrounding environment. Vesicles are found in numerous habitats including the oceans, where they likely have a variety of functional roles in microbial ecosystems. Extracellular vesicles are known to contain a range of biomolecules including DNA, but the frequency with which DNA is packaged in vesicles is unknown. Here, we examine the quantity and distribution of DNA associated with vesicles released from five different bacteria. The average quantity of double-stranded DNA and size distribution of DNA fragments released within vesicles varies among different taxa. Although some vesicles contain sufficient DNA to be visible following staining with the SYBR fluorescent DNA dyes typically used to enumerate viruses, this represents only a small proportion (<0.01-1%) of vesicles. Thus DNA is packaged heterogeneously within vesicle populations, and it appears that vesicles are likely to be a minor component of SYBR-visible particles in natural sea water compared with viruses. Consistent with this hypothesis, chloroform treatment of coastal and offshore seawater samples reveals that vesicles increase epifluorescence-based particle (viral) counts by less than an order of magnitude and their impact is variable in space and time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据