4.3 Review

Recent developments of layered transition metal oxide cathodes for sodium-ion batteries toward desired high performance

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/apj.2762

关键词

cathode materials; layered transition metal oxides; review; sodium-ion batteries

资金

  1. Natrium Company
  2. General Program of Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [20ZR1438400]
  3. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [21QA1406500, 20QA1407100]
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Program [21PJ1411100]
  5. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2019-01-07-00-07-E00015]
  6. Shanghai Outstanding Academic Leaders Plan
  7. Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist [17XD1403000]
  8. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52171218, 21905174, 51902301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the recent progress of layered transition metal oxide cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries, discusses their advantages and challenges, and provides insights for the development of high-performance sodium-ion batteries.
With the development of society, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) attract more and more attention and are expected to be the next generation of daily energy storage devices. Among the previously reported cathode materials for SIBs, the layered transition metal oxides are considered to be the most competitive cathode materials due to their high specific capacities, simple synthesis process, and many similar advantages to the successful Li transition metal oxides in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). This review summarizes the recent progress of layered transition metal oxide cathode materials for SIBs, which mainly include Mn-based, Ni/Mn-based, Ni/Co/Mn-based, and Ni/Fe/Mn-based layered cathode materials. The remaining challenges and future developments for the layered transition metal oxide cathode materials are also discussed. This review is expected to provide some insights into the development of layered transition metal oxide cathodes for high-performance SIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据