4.6 Review

Effects of Hypertonic Dextrose Injection (Prolotherapy) in Lateral Elbow Tendinosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

期刊

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
卷 103, 期 11, 页码 2209-2218

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.01.166

关键词

Meta-analysis; Pain; Prolotherapy; Rehabilitation; Systematic review; Tennis elbow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review examines the effectiveness of hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) in treating lateral elbow tendinosis (LET). The pooled results suggest that DPT can significantly reduce pain intensity and improve physical functioning in LET patients without major adverse events. DPT may be considered as a nonsurgical treatment option, especially for those refractory to first-line treatments.
Objective: To systematically review the effectiveness of hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) on pain intensity and physical functioning in patients with lateral elbow tendinosis (LET) compared with other active non-surgical treatments. Data Sources: Systematic search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, Dimensions, Global Health, NHS Health Technology Assessment, Allied and Complementary Medicine, and OVID nursing database from inception to June 15, 2021, without language restrictions. Study Selection: Two reviewers independently identified parallel or crossover randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of DPT in LET. The search identified 245 records; data from 8 studies (354 patients) were included. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed included studies. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to evaluate risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess quality of the evidence. Data Synthesis: Pooled results favored the use of DPT in reducing tennis elbow pain intensity compared with active controls at 12 weeks postenrollment, with a standardized mean difference of-0.44 (95% confidence interval,-0.88 to-0.01, P=.04) and of moderate heterogeneity (I-2=49%). Pooled results also favored the use of DPT on physical functioning compared with active controls at 12 weeks, with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores achieving a mean difference of-15.04 (95% confidence interval,-20.25 to-9.82, P <.001) and of low heterogeneity (I-2=0.0%). No major related adverse events have been reported. Conclusions: DPT is superior to active controls at 12 weeks for decreasing pain intensity and functioning by margins that meet criteria for clinical relevance in the treatment of LET. Although existing studies are too small to assess rare adverse events, for patients with LET, especially those refractory to first-line treatments, DPT can be considered a nonsurgical treatment option in carefully selected patients. Further high-quality trials with comparison with other injection therapies are needed. (C) 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据