4.4 Review

Bioremediation of organic pollutants: a mini review on current and critical strategies for wastewater treatment

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 204, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-022-02907-9

关键词

Persistent organic pollutants; Wastewater; Bioremediation; Artificial intelligence; Genetic engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the threat of organic pollutants to sustainable development and the importance of wastewater treatment. Bioremediation plays a key role in removing organic pollutants and is an economical and environmentally friendly method of wastewater treatment. The article also explores the application of genetically engineered microbes and artificial intelligence techniques in bioremediation, as well as identifying issues and research needs in the process.
The release and prevalence of organic pollutants in an aqueous environment due to industrial discharges, agricultural operations, or inappropriate waste disposal is a huge threat to attaining sustainable development. As a result, wastewater treatment has attained a huge scope as it is evident from the number of articles published in recent years. Among the various techniques, bioremediation is one of the economical and eco-friendly means of wastewater treatment for the removal of organic pollutants. Microbial community and microalgae are the front runners of this process as they result in treated water and sludge or biomass formation. This mini review put forwards the types of organic pollutants and the bioremediation strategies using microbes and micro-algae, the role of genetically engineered microbes on the bio-remediation of organic pollutants and the recent applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques that have been implemented for improving the efficiency of the methods. The gap between practicability and applicability of the bioremediation process was also identified in this review. In addition, the economics and future research needs are discussed as outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据