4.5 Article

Novel isoxazoline-linked 1,3,4-thiadiazole hybrids as anticancer agents: Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation

期刊

ARCHIV DER PHARMAZIE
卷 355, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ardp.202200066

关键词

1; 3; 4-thiadiazole; antiproliferative activity; apoptosis; hybrid molecules; isoxazoline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, isoxazoline derivatives with 1,3,4-thiadiazole moiety were efficiently synthesized using natural (R)-carvone as a starting material. The synthesized compounds exhibited moderate to high anticancer activity and could induce apoptosis through caspase-3/7 activation.
In the current study, natural (R)-carvone was utilized as a starting material for the efficient synthesis of two series of isoxazoline derivatives bearing the 1,3,4-thiadiazole moiety. The new compounds were obtained in good yields and were characterized by H-1 and C-13 NMR and HRMS analysis. The newly synthesized monoterpenic isoxazoline 1,3,4-thiadiazole and their thiosemicarbazone intermediate derivatives were evaluated for their anticancer activity in four cancer cell lines (HT-1080, A-549, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-231). Most of the synthesized compounds exhibited moderate to high anticancer effects. Compound 13c showed the highest anticancer activity with IC50 values ranging from 19.33 +/- 1.81 to 34.81 +/- 3.03 mu M. Further investigation revealed that compounds 12e and 13c could inhibit the cell growth of HT-1080 and MCF-7 cells by inducing apoptosis through caspase-3/7 activation. The apoptotic effect was accompanied by an S phase and G2/M cell cycle arrest for 13c and 12e, respectively. Compounds 12e and 13c were assessed in silico using molecular docking and molecular dynamics. We found that compound 13c is moderately active against the caspase-3 protein, which triggers apoptosis via intrinsic and extrinsic routes, making compound 13c a promising candidate to activate the proapoptotic protein (caspase-3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据