4.5 Article

Differences of photosynthesis and nutrient utilization in Sargassum fusiforme and its main epiphyte, Ulva lactuca

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 8, 页码 3176-3187

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.15830

关键词

epiphytic algae; photosynthesis; Sargassum fusiforme; seaweed cultivation; Ulva lactuca

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41706147, 41876124]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD0901500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the biological characteristics of Sargassum fusiforme and its epiphytic algae Ulva lactuca and found that Ulva lactuca generally had higher photosynthetic electron activity and nitrogen uptake and utilization rates compared to S. fusiforme, which may lead to stress on S. fusiforme.
Sargassum fusiforme is often adversely affected by epiphytic algae during its cultivation. However, the biological differences between S. fusiforme and the epiphytic algae have not yet been elucidated detrimental to the management of S. fusiforme culture. In this study, we sampled S. fusiforme and main epiphytic algae Ulva lactuca in a marine culture cycle and compared their biological characteristics. It indicated that, except during low-temperature months (January and March), the photosynthetic electron activity of U. lactuca were generally higher than S. fusiforme. The nitrogen uptake rates of S. fusiforme and U. lactuca were all significantly higher in the earlier growth stage than other stages. In most cases, the nitrogen uptake and utilization of U. lactuca was higher than those of S. fusiforme. Although S. fusiforme absorbed more trace elements, U. lactuca had relatively strong photosynthesis and nutrient absorption performance; thus, the latter accumulated more soluble carbohydrate and protein and may have stress effect on S. fusiforme. This study will be helpful for understanding the differences in the biological characteristics of economic seaweed and its epiphytic macroalgae and provides a reference for the friendly management and healthy development of seaweed cultivation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据