4.7 Article

Theoretical study the influence of partial substitute noble metal Pd/Ag of PdAg-based catalyst by non-noble metal Ni/Cu for 1,3-Butadiene hydrogenation

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 588, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.152897

关键词

1,3-butadiene; Hydrogenation mechanism; DFT simulations; Alloy catalysts

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22172083, 21962013]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China [2021JQ02, 2021MS02010, 2019CG032]
  3. 111 Project [D20033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Partial replacement of noble metal Pd or Ag with inexpensive metals Ni or Cu in AgPd catalyst can reduce cost and improve the conversion and selectivity of the hydrogenation reaction.
Selective hydrogenation of 1,3-butadiene to form butene is an important tool for the removal of 1,3-butadiene which is a by-product of olefin production. AgPd bimetallic catalysts improved the butene selective, but its expensive cost is still an urgent problem. In this study, we introduced a third inexpensive metal Ni or Cu to replace part of the noble metal Pd or Ag in a common AgPd catalyst and studied the influence of the introduction on the hydrogenation reaction by DFT. Compared with the Ag3Pd and AgPd3 alloys, AgCuPd2 and Ag2NiPd hardly changed the adsorption energy of 1,3-butadiene and hydrogen but lowered the butene adsorption energy, which indicates that the addition of Cu or Ni metals can improve the butene selectivity. By calculating the reaction pathways, it was found that the energy barriers of 1,3-butadiene hydrogenation to butene on AgCuPd2 and Ag2NiPd was lower than that of Ag3Pd and AgPd3 alloys, while the energy barriers of butene further hydrogenation to butane was much larger than the desorption energy of butene. The partial replacement of Ag or Pd atom of AgPd alloys with Cu or Ni not only reduces the catalyst cost but also improves the conversion and selectivity of the hydrogenation reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据