4.7 Article

Activated palladium deposited on defect-rich carbon and cobalt oxide composite materials as bi-functional catalysts for stable rechargeable Zn-air battery

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 582, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.152442

关键词

Defect-rich carbon; Electron-deficient palladium; Oxygen vacancy; Zn-air battery

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2020R1A2C2010445]
  2. MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) [IITP-2020-2020-0-01655]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of defect-rich carbon with oxidized palladium and cobalt oxide improves the oxygen reduction and evolution reactions in zinc-air batteries, resulting in superior catalytic activity and stability.
Using defect-rich carbon with slightly oxidized palladium and oxygen-vacancy-induced cobalt oxide from ZIF-67 improves the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), which are crucial reactions for air cathodes of desirable Zn-air batteries. Electron-deficient palladium and free electron at oxygen vacancies facilitate the adsorption of oxygen species, thereby enhancing the OER performance. Moreover, hybridization of defect-rich N-doped carbon with catalytically active Pd nanoparticles advances the ORR activity. Through a delicate synthetic method, we synthesized the bi-functional catalysts, Pd and CoOx embedded in defect-rich and N-doped carbon materials (Pd/CoOx/d-NC), for rechargeable Zn-air battery. Pd/CoOx/d-NC exhibits superior activities and robust durability for both the ORR and OER. In addition, it shows higher performance than the benchmark Pt/C + IrO2 when applied to the Zn-air battery. The robust durability for ORR and OER of Pd/CoOx/d-NC results in charge-discharge cycle stability. The outstanding catalytic activities and stable cycle life of Pd/CoOx/d-NC verifies its potential as a catalyst for air cathode in practical Zn-air battery application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据