4.7 Article

Flower-like CeO2-supported small-sized Ru nanoparticle hybrids for highly efficient alkaline hydrogen evolution: Roles of interfacial effects

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 581, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152256

关键词

Cerium oxide; Ruthenium; Hydrogen evolution reaction; Interfacial effects; DFT calculations

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundations of China [21673108, 2210060309]
  2. Open Foundations of State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry [SKLCC1917]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a unique three-dimensional Ru/CeO2 hybrid with interfacial effects to significantly enhance the performance of electrocatalysts for alkaline HER. The Ru/CeO2 interfaces as real active sites play a crucial role in optimizing the hydrogen binding and water absorption/dissociation energies. The optimal hybrid catalyst with low Ru loadings exhibits a small overpotential, low Tafel slope, and excellent long-term durability.
Ruthenium (Ru) is perceived as a promising electrocatalyst for alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) due to its fast water dissociation ability, but its performance is mainly limited by the intense hydrogen bond strength. Herein, the unique three-dimensional Ru/CeO2 hybrids with interfacial effects were proposed to significantly enhance the alkaline HER performance of Ru. The combination of structural characterizations, electrochemical analyses and theoretical calculations demonstrates that Ru/CeO2 interfaces as real active sites play a crucial role. The strong surface interaction bewteen small-sized Ru nanoparticles and nanosheet-based flower-like CeO2 suppotrs not only greatly increases the actives sites but also optimizes the hydrogen binding and water absorption/dissociation energies. Subsequently, the optimal hybrid catalyst with low Ru loadings of only 3 wt% exhibits a relatively small overpotential of 28.9 mV at 10 mA cm-2, a low Tafel slope of 53.2 mV dec-1 as well as an excellent long-term durability in 1 M KOH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据