4.7 Article

Low-density arrays of ultra-small InAs nanostructures obtained by two-stage arsenic exposure during droplet epitaxy

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 578, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152023

关键词

Droplet epitaxy; InAs/GaAs; Nanostructures; Quantum dots; Low-density arrays; Arsenic exposure

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-79-10099]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-79-10099] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel droplet epitaxial technique for fabricating small-sized nanostructures, achieving low size dispersion and high reproducibility of quantum dots through a two-stage crystallization process in different arsenic fluxes.
In order to consider quantum dots as single objects and to use them in modern electronic and photonic devices, they must be well-isolated from each other and have an appropriate size and structural quality. This is a big challenge that is difficult to achieve with traditional technological methods, such as the Stranski-Krastanov growth mechanism. In this paper, we present a novel droplet epitaxial technique for the fabrication of small-sized (similar to 25 nm) InAs/GaAs nanostructures with a low surface density (<1.10(8) cm(-2)). To achieve this result, we develop a growth method based on two-stage crystallization in the arsenic flux. At the first stage, the droplet size is reduced by spreading the droplet material over the surface due to the diffusion decay of droplets in an ultra-low arsenic flux. At the second stage, crystallization is carried out in a large arsenic flux while heating the substrate in order to fix the size and shape of nanodroplets and prevent them from further decaying. We demonstrate that the size dispersion of nanostructures is small and the process is well-reproducible. Thus, the presented approach makes it possible to obtain low-density quantum dots with an ultra-small size required for advanced optical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据