4.7 Article

Joint entity and relation extraction with position-aware attention and relation embedding

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108604

关键词

Entity recognition; Relation extraction; Relation embedding; Attention mechanism; Gate mechanism

资金

  1. Basic Research Project, China [JCKY2019604C004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a joint extraction model named PARE-Joint, which addresses the interaction between entities and relations as well as the overlapping triple problem using position-aware attention and relation embedding. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms other baselines on four public datasets.
The joint extraction of entities and relations is an important task in natural language processing, which aims to obtain all relational triples in plain text. However, few existing methods excel in solving the overlapping triple problem. Moreover, most methods ignore the position and order of the words in the entity in the entity extraction process, which affects the performance of triples extraction. To solve these problems, a joint extraction model with position-aware attention and relation embedding is proposed, named PARE-Joint. The proposed model first recognizes the subjects, and then uses the subject and relation guided attention network to learn the enhanced sentence representation and determine the corresponding objects. In this way, the interaction between entities and relations is captured, and the overlapping triple problem can be better resolved. In addition, taking into account the important role of word order in the entity for triple extraction, the position-aware attention mechanism is used to extract the subjects and the objects in the sentences, respectively. The experimental results demonstrate that our model can solve the overlapping triple problem more effectively and outperform other baselines on four public datasets.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据