4.6 Article

Chitosan hydrogel wrapped bimetallic nanoparticles based efficient catalysts for the catalytic removal of organic pollutants and hydrogen production

期刊

APPLIED ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.6741

关键词

catalytic reduction; chitosan hydrogel; metal nanoparticles; hydrogen generation; organic and inorganic pollutants

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia [G: 279-247-1442]
  2. DSR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel catalytic system based on bimetallic nanoparticles entrapped chitosan hydrogel container (Cu-Ag/CH, Cu-Co/CH, Cu-Ni/CH) was prepared for efficient water treatment and H-2 generation, as well as reduction of organic pollutants. Among the catalysts, Cu-Co/CH showed superior performance in catalytic H-2 generation, while Cu-Ni/CH exhibited better efficiency in catalytic reduction of toxic contaminants.
A novel catalytic system based on bimetallic nanoparticles entrapped chitosan hydrogel container (Cu-Ag/CH, Cu-Co/CH, Cu-Ni/CH) was prepared. The developed catalytic system was applied for production of H-2 from water and methanol and reduction of 4-nitrophenol (4-NP), 3-nitrophenol, 2-nitrophenol, 2,6-dinitrophenol, methylene blue, congo red (CR), methyl orange, acridine orange, and potassium ferricynide (K-3[Fe(CN)(6)]). The developed catalytic system has shown tremendous performance and exhibited high efficiency as a catalyst for water treatment and H-2 generation. Among all the nanocatalysts, Cu-Co/CH was more efficient in catalytic H-2 generation while Cu-Ni/CH was more efficient in catalytic reduction of toxic contaminants. Further, various parameters like amount of NaBH4, catalyst quantity, pollutant concentration, and temperature were optimized to enhance the effectiveness of catalytic system for fast production of H-2 and reduction of toxins. Moreover, the recyclability of the catalyst was investigated, where slight decrease in reduction time was noted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据