4.7 Article

Comparison of inviscid and viscid one-dimensional models of blood flow in arteries

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION
卷 418, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126856

关键词

Blood flow; Hemodynamics; One-dimensional model; Non-Newtonian fluid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper compares one-dimensional blood flow models for solving model problems. The non-Newtonian properties of blood and the viscid case are considered. Analytical and numerical methods are proposed for solving problems. The effects of viscosity and velocity profile on blood flow are analyzed through model comparison.
The paper is devoted to the comparison of one-dimensional blood flow models in application to the solution of model problems. In the viscid case, the non-Newtonian properties of blood are considered. Original one-dimensional models, based on the Carreau, Carreau-Yasuda, Cross, and Powell-Eyring rheological models, are constructed by the averaging of the Navier-Stokes equations. The approach to the analytical solution of problems in the inviscid case is proposed. The originality of the method is based on the small perturbation of the initial rest state, corresponding to zero velocity. It leads to the solution of the linear wave equations. The solutions of three problems - for the infinite, semi-infinite, and finite intervals are obtained. The examples are presented for the small parameter value similar to 10 -2. Analytical solutions are used for the comparison of different one-dimensional models of blood flow, where the viscosity (Newtonian and non-Newtonian) is considered. The problems for the viscid models are solved numerically by the third-order WENO scheme. As the results of the comparison of models, the effects of the viscosity and velocity profile are analyzed. From a practical viewpoint, the solutions obtained by the perturbation method can be used for the testing of programs for numerical simulations and for the comparison of different blood flow models. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据