4.5 Article

Anti-fatigue mats can reduce low back discomfort in transient pain developers

期刊

APPLIED ERGONOMICS
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103661

关键词

Anti-fatigue mats; Low back pain; Prolonged standing

资金

  1. Centre for Research Expertise for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders (CRE-MSD)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [227638]
  3. NSERC CGS
  4. NSERC-PGS
  5. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  6. Canada Research Chair in Spine Biomechanics and Injury Prevention (Tier 1)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the use of anti-fatigue mats (AFM) can reduce low back pain levels for individuals prone to developing standing-induced back pain. Additionally, AFMs facilitate subtle movements at the foot-floor interface, potentially helping to alleviate back pain caused by standing for long periods.
Complaints of musculoskeletal pain are common among employees who stand for prolonged periods. This study sought to determine if an anti-fatigue mat (AFM) could uniquely affect low back pain (LBP), low back posture, and foot-floor interface responses in individuals prone to developing LBP (termed pain developers (PDs)) during prolonged standing experiments compared to those who do not develop LBP under the same exposures (termed non pain developers (NPDs)). Sixteen volunteers (8 PDs and 8 NPDs) were recruited based on their paindevelopment tendencies, which were established in previous standing experiments. They visited the laboratory on two separate days for 60 min of light manual work while standing on either a rigid floor or AFM. All participants were asymptomatic at the beginning of each experimental session. The amount of LBP experienced during the standing exposure, measured via a visual analogue scale, was reduced (p = 0.03) in the PD group when on the AFM (3.6 +/- 6 mm) compared to the rigid floor (6.8 +/- 7 mm). LBP levels remained low and unchanged (p = 0.5) between the AFM (2.4 +/- 5 mm) and rigid floor (1.6 +/- 2 mm) conditions for the NPD group. Neither postural nor foot-floor interface measures correlated with this unique reduction of LBP for the PD group when standing on the AFM. The AFM did, however, increase centre of pressure excursion (NPD 55% increase; PD 35% increase) and tended to increase the number of body weight shifts (NPD 116% increase; PD 54% increase) in both the PD and NPD groups. These findings suggest that AFMs may selectively benefit individuals prone to developing standing-induced back pain by facilitating subtle movements at the foot-floor interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据