4.8 Article

Exploring the global and local social sustainability of wind energy technologies: An application of a social impact assessment framework

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 312, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118808

关键词

Social impact; Social life cycle assessment; Renewable energy technologies; Sustainability; Wind energy

资金

  1. Special Research Fund (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds - BOF) of Ghent University [BOF.24Y.2018.003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A social impact assessment framework for renewable energy technologies was developed and applied in a wind energy case study. The results showed that offshore wind projects have larger impacts on global well-being but are less intrusive for the local population.
A transition to renewable energy sources is needed in the EU countries to achieve their goal of a low-carbon economy. This transition may come with potentially negative impacts on the well-being of the population, both globally and locally. Such social impacts are not yet systematically assessed for renewable energy technologies. In this paper, a social impact assessment framework for renewable energy technologies is developed and applied for a wind energy case study. The assessed social categories comprise impacts on human health, human rights infractions, working conditions, local job creation, quality of residential life, landscape quality. In order to cover this broad field of social impacts, four distinct social impact assessment methods were combined in a common social impact assessment framework. The application of the framework was demonstrated by means of the wind energy case study. The results are presented in the form of a social sustainability dashboard comprising 23 social impact indicators covering both global and local well-being impacts. The analysis showed that the life cycle material demand of offshore wind projects has larger impacts on global well-being than the onshore alternatives. For the local dimension, the offshore case was found to be less intrusive for the local population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据