4.8 Article

An abnormal wind turbine data cleaning algorithm based on color space conversion and image feature detection

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 311, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118594

关键词

Wind turbine; Abnormal data cleaning; Wind power curve; Hough transform; Canny edge detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [51807023, 51936003]
  2. Natural Sci-ence Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20180382]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a data cleaning algorithm for wind turbine abnormal data based on wind power curve image by color space conversion and image feature detection. Extensive experiments conducted on the data of 22 wind turbines from two different wind farms in China indicate the efficiency, stability, and reliability of the proposed algorithm.
Wind power curve (WPC) is established through data collected from the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system of each wind turbine, which can be used to analyze the operation status. However, numerous outliers are contained in SCADA data caused by wind turbine failures, shutdown maintenance or other extreme conditions to deform the wind power curve. This paper proposes a data cleaning algorithm for wind turbine abnormal data based on wind power curve image by color space conversion and image feature detection. Considering wind speed, wind power and data frequency, a three-dimensional (3D) WPC image is constructed. The scattered outliers are cleared by their statistical characteristics. The Canny edge detection and Hough transform are introduced to extract image features of stacked outliers and locate them accurately. The proposed algorithm is compared with three common outlier detection algorithms, including two data-based algorithms and an image-based algorithm. Extensive experiments conducted on the data of 22 wind turbines from two different wind farms in China indicate the efficiency, stability and reliability of the proposed algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据