4.8 Article

Microwave assisted facile fabrication of dual Z-scheme g-C3N4/ZnFe2O4/Bi2S3 photocatalyst for peroxymonosulphate mediated degradation of 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol: The mechanistic insights

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 307, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121165

关键词

Chlorophenols; Heterojunction composite; Dual Z-scheme; Catalytic degradation; Intermediate analysis

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [DST/TM/WTI/WIC/2K17/84 (G)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A ternary dual Z-scheme composite material was synthesized and its photocatalytic performance under visible light was explored. The catalyst showed effective removal of pollutants under specific conditions and demonstrated excellent performance in separating photogenerated charge carriers.
A ternary dual Z-scheme composite gCN/ZnFe2O4/Bi2S3 (ZFO/BS) was synthesized via a facile microwave assisted process and its photocatalytic potential was explored towards visible light driven removal of 2,4,6-triboundFe(2+/3+)|(surf.),Zn+/2+|(surf.)andBi(3+/4+)|(surf.) were effective towards charge carrier channelization and evolution cholorophenol (TCP) with subsequent peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation. Surface of reactive species. Highest catalytic activity was experienced for the catalyst with 10 wt% Bi2S3 (ZFO/BS(10)) and 98.9% TCP was removed with 0.25 gL-1 catalyst and 1.0 gL-1 PMS, under 60 mins visible light irradiation (intensity: 80 W). Construction of dual Z-scheme heterojunction was studied using XPS and the mechanism of e(-)/h(+) separation was elucidated. In-depth radical scavenging and EPR analysis confirmed the coexistence and relative contributions of various reactive radicals towards degradation. Plausible TCP degradation pathway was designed based on intermediate analysis. This study elucidates the superiority of dual Z-scheme ternary heterojunction towards separation of photogenerated charge carriers and mineralization of various emerging contaminants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据