4.8 Article

Highly reactive Cu-Pt bimetallic 3D-electrocatalyst for selective nitrate reduction to ammonia

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 302, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120844

关键词

Water treatment; Selective electrocatalytic reduction; Resource recovery; Denitrification; Ammonia production

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Nanosystems Engi-neering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment [EEC-1449500]
  3. European Union [843870]
  4. [NNCI-ECCS-1542160]
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [843870] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bimetallic Cu-Pt foam electrodes show promise in treating contaminated water sources with nitrate, achieving sustainable ammonia recovery with high selectivity and low energy consumption.
Identifying electrocatalytic materials that generate fossil-free ammonia through N-recycling from polluted water sources is required. Bimetallic Cu-Pt foam electrodes were synthesized to enhance electrochemical reduction of nitrate (ERN) by the introduction of bimetallic catalytic sites. Electrodes were benchmarked against Cu foam using engineering figures of merit. Cu-Pt (180 s) electrode achieved 94% conversion of NO3--N in 120 min yielding 194.4 mg NH3- N L-1 g(cat)(-1), with a selectivity towards ammonia (S-NH3) of 84% and an electrical energy per order decrease by similar to 70% respect pristine Cu foam. Bimetallic electrodes with low Pt loadings (<0.50 wt%) demonstrated that synergistic effects of Cu-Pt nanointerfaces enabled hybridized mechanisms of catalytic electrochemical and hydrogenation reduction processes. These encouraging outcomes emphasize the potential of Cu-Pt foam electrodes to treat contaminated water sources with nitrate, while allowing a sustainable decentralized ammonia recovery. Enriched water for crops irrigation can therefore be a prospect use for this added value product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据