4.1 Article

Modification of the Chemical Structure, Morphology, and Cytocompatibility of Chitosan Films via Low-Frequency Plasma Treatment

期刊

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND MICROBIOLOGY
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 118-125

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S000368382202003X

关键词

chitosan; low-frequency plasma; regenerative medicine; surface; keratinocytes; cells

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [18-15-00401]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [18-15-00401] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effect of low-frequency plasma treatment on the surface properties of chitosan films and its impact on the adhesion and proliferation of human keratinocytes. The results showed that plasma treatment resulted in the formation of polar oxygen-containing groups on the surface, reduced surface roughness, and increased surface hydrophilicity. The chitosan films exhibited cytocompatibility and supported keratinocyte viability in extract or cell cultivation applications. Plasma treatment enhanced the adhesion properties of chitosan films to cells and stimulated keratinocyte proliferation, which is crucial for the use of chitosan-containing materials as wound dressings.
The effect of low-frequency plasma treatment of chitosan films on the surface chemical structure, morphology, and properties, including the ability to support adhesion and the proliferation of human keratinocytes, was evaluated. It was shown that plasma treatment led to the formation of polar oxygen-containing groups on the surface, a decrease in surface roughness, and an increase in surface hydrophilicity. The chitosan film samples were cytocompatible, and they maintained keratinocyte viability when used as extracts or as supports for cell cultivation. Plasma treatment of chitosan films increased their adhesion properties with respect to cells and activated keratinocyte proliferation, which is important for the application of chitosan-containing materials as a wound dressing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据