4.6 Review

Cuffless Blood Pressure Measurement

期刊

ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 203-230

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110220-014644

关键词

blood pressure determination; cuffless blood pressure; oscillometry; pulse transit time; pulse wave analysis; wearable electronic devices

资金

  1. NIH [HL146470]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cuffless blood pressure measurement is a popular research field driven by clinical need and technological opportunity. This review provides an overview of the development and application of cuffless BP measurement methods, including the principles of conventional BP measurement, the problems that cuffless methods can address, the technological advances that are driving the field, and the current evidence of various cuffless methods under investigation.
Cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement has become a popular field due to clinical need and technological opportunity. However, no method has been broadly accepted hitherto. The objective of this review is to accelerate progress in the development and application of cuffless BP measurement methods. We begin by describing the principles of conventional BP measurement, outstanding hypertension/hypotension problems that could be addressed with cuffless methods, and recent technological advances, including smartphone proliferation and wearable sensing, that are driving the field. We then present all major cuffless methods under investigation, including their current evidence. Our presentation includes calibrated methods (i.e., pulse transit time, pulse wave analysis, and facial video processing) and uncalibrated methods (i.e., cuffless oscillometry, ultrasound, and volume control). The calibrated methods can offer convenience advantages, whereas the uncalibrated methods do not require periodic cuff device usage or demographic inputs. We conclude by summarizing the field and highlighting potentially useful future research directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据