4.7 Article

Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Who Should Get Postoperative Radiation?

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 5582-5590

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11898-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to report the experience of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) who received postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). The results showed that patients who received PORT had improved locoregional recurrence-free probability, but it did not translate into improved disease-specific survival and overall survival.
Background The mainstay of treatment of well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) is surgery followed by adjuvant radioactive iodine therapy. Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is rarely used. Objective The aim of our study was to report our experience of patients with WDTC who were selected to receive PORT. Materials and Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, patients who received PORT were identified from a departmental database of 6259 patients with WDTC treated with primary surgery from 1986 to 2015. We carried out propensity matching to compare outcomes with a cohort of patients who did not receive PORT. The main outcome of interest was central neck recurrence-free probability (CNRFP), while secondary outcomes were lateral neck recurrence-free probability (LNRFP), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Results From 6259 patients, 32 (0.5%) patients with a median age of 65.2 years received PORT. Tall-cell variant papillary thyroid carcinoma was the most common pathology (45%). Patients who received PORT had no difference in CNRFP compared with patients treated without PORT (10-year CNRFP 88% vs. 73%; p = 0.18). Furthermore, patients who received PORT had superior LNRFP (10-year LNRFP 100% vs. 62%; p = 0.001) compared with the no-PORT cohort. Despite this, patients who received PORT had similar DSS (71% PORT vs. 75% no-PORT) and OS (65% PORT vs. 58% no-PORT group) as the no-PORT cohort. Conclusions Our data show that select patients who received PORT had improved locoregional recurrence-free probability; however, this did not translate into improved DSS and OS. At our institution, we recommend the use of PORT only in highly selected patients with locally advanced primary tumors who are deemed to have a high risk of central neck recurrence for which salvage surgery would result in unacceptable risk to the airway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据