4.6 Article

MRFE-CNN: multi-route feature extraction model for breast tumor segmentation in Mammograms using a convolutional neural network

期刊

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 328, 期 1, 页码 1021-1042

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04755-8

关键词

Medical image analysis; Breast cancer; Breast tumor segmentation; Deep learning; Pectoral muscle segmentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer is a dangerous and deadly disease. We propose an automatic breast tumor segmentation and recognition method based on a shallow convolutional neural network that can improve the accuracy of tumor border detection and the classification accuracy of tumors.
Breast cancer is cancer that develops from the breast tissue and has been recognized as one of the most dangerous and deadly diseases that is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women. To help doctors and radiologists to diagnose these tumors as well as decrease the time and increase the accuracy, many machine learning methods have been implemented by now. Most of these methods suffer from extracting some significant features that represent the boundary of tumors. This is due to the fact that benign and malignant tumors can be considered the same if some borders cannot segment properly. So, in this study, we propose an automatic breast tumor segmentation and recognition based on a shallow convolutional neural network that uses multi-feature extraction routes. Also, an image enhancement approach is used before applying the image into the model which leads to avoiding a very deep structure. Our strategy leads to improvement in detecting the border of tumors and boosts the classification accuracy of tumors. We evaluated our pipeline on Mammographic Image Analysis Society (Mini-MIAS) and Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) datasets. The developed model can localize and classify tumors with the accuracy of 0.936, 0.890, 0.871 on the DDSM, and 0.944, 0.915, 0.892 on the Mini-MIAS, for normal, benign, and malignant regions, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据