4.5 Article

A prospective study of preconception asthma and spontaneous abortion

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 27-33

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.02.006

关键词

Maternal asthma; Asthma severity; Spontaneous abortion; Miscarriage

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Health [R01 HD086742]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that there was no significant association between a history of asthma and the incidence of spontaneous abortion (SAB), but severe asthma (based on medication use) was associated with a higher risk of SAB.
Purpose: To evaluate the relationships among history of asthma, asthma severity, and spontaneous abortion (SAB). Methods: Pregnancy Study Online is a preconception cohort study of North American couples. During the preconception period, female participants reported their history of physician-diagnosed asthma, age at first diagnosis, and use of asthma medications in the previous 4 weeks. Asthma severity was classified by medication use proximal to conception, from level 0 to 3 in increasing severity. Pregnancy and SAB were identified using data from follow-up questionnaires. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 6325 participants who conceived, 19% experienced SAB and 17% reported a history of asthma. There was no appreciable association between asthma history and SAB incidence (HR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.14). HRs comparing severity levels 0, 1, and 2-3 with no asthma were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.01), 1.20 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.60), and 1.31 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.78), respectively. Among women who conceived without the use of fertility treatment, level 2-3 severity was associated with SAB (HR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.89). Conclusions: While history of asthma diagnosis was not materially associated with SAB, having severe asthma (based on medication use) was associated with greater SAB risk. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据