4.4 Article

BAYESIAN ADJUSTMENT FOR PREFERENTIAL TESTING IN ESTIMATING INFECTION FATALITY RATES, AS MOTIVATED BY THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

期刊

ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 436-459

出版社

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS-IMS
DOI: 10.1214/21-AOAS1499

关键词

Selection bias; partial identification; evidence synthesis

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under ReCoDID grant [825746]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Genetics (CIHR-IG) [01886-000]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [825746] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estimating the infection fatality rate (IFR) is challenging due to the unknown total number of cases. This is because not everyone is tested and tested individuals may not be representative of the entire population. In this study, a Bayesian model is used to estimate the COVID-19 IFR for Europe by combining information from different samples.
A key challenge in estimating the infection fatality rate (IFR), along with its relation with various factors of interest, is determining the total number of cases. The total number of cases is not known not only because not everyone is tested but also, more importantly, because tested individuals are not representative of the population at large. We refer to the phenomenon whereby infected individuals are more likely to be tested than noninfected individuals as preferential testing. An open question is whether or not it is possible to reliably estimate the IFR without any specific knowledge about the degree to which the data are biased by preferential testing. In this paper we take a partial identifiability approach, formulating clearly where deliberate prior assumptions can be made and presenting a Bayesian model which pools information from different samples. When the model is fit to European data obtained from seroprevalence studies and national official COVID-19 statistics, we estimate the overall COVID-19 IFR for Europe to be 0.53%, 95% C.I. = [0.38%, 0.70%].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据