4.6 Article

Growth performance, carcass characteristics, and blood biochemical indices of broilers affected by dietary organic acids biendis supplementation

期刊

ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2022.2068025

关键词

Organic acids; carcass; blood; antioxidants; broilers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of an organic acids cocktail on broiler diets. Results showed that feed consumption and feed conversion were not affected by the organic acids cocktail, except at 1-2 weeks of age. Carcass traits and blood indices were significantly different due to the treatments. It is recommended to use the highest and middle levels of the organic acids cocktail for optimal performance and health of broilers.
The objective of the present study was to explore the influence of organic acids cocktail (lactic-L plus formic-F acid, LF) in broiler diets on feed utilization, growth rate, blood indices and carcass traits. A total of 300 chicks were used and allotted to five treatment groups. The rations contained 0 additives (negative control-NC), basal diet + 0.5 g Colistin (R) (positive control-PC); LF2, LF4 and LF6: basal diet + 2, 4 and 6 cm(3) LF/kg diet, respectively. There were no differences in feed consumption and feed conversion due to LF treatments at all ages except Fl at 1-2 wks of age which was significantly affected by gradual levels of LF (p < 0.05). All carcass traits were statistically significant (p < 0.05) differed due to LF treatments. The alterations in urea, creatinine total protein, globulin and albumin in addition to the activity of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase in broiler chicks were significantly different when compared to controls. Malondialdehyde (MDA) slightly decreased with an increase in the level of formic plus lactic. Based on our results, the highest and middle levels (6 and 4 cm(3) LF/kg diet) are recommended for the best performance and health aspects of broilers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据