4.3 Article

Corrosion of orthodontic brackets: qualitative and quantitative surface analysis

期刊

ANGLE ORTHODONTIST
卷 92, 期 5, 页码 661-668

出版社

E H ANGLE EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC
DOI: 10.2319/072321-584.1

关键词

Corrosion; Brackets

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to determine and compare the surface characteristics and presence of corrosion in new and used brackets. The results showed that used brackets exhibited more signs of corrosion compared to new ones.
Objectives: To determine and compare surface characteristics and presence of corrosion in new and used brackets with optical light microscopy (OLM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and with elemental chemical analysis with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).Materials and Methods: OLM and SEM were used to analyze 24 new and 24 used conventional premolar brackets. EDS analysis was performed in six used brackets and four new brackets with corrosion-suspected spots.Results: OLM and SEM images showed wear/abfraction signs, striations, pits/crevices, and adherent material. Used brackets showed more deterioration than new brackets. SEM images disclosed more morphological features than OLM images. EDS analysis revealed a significantly higher phosphorus (P 1/4 .001) and sodium (P < .005) weight fraction and significantly lower amounts of chromium (P < .001) in used brackets. The iron, chromium, and nickel weight fractions did not differ significantly between the clean and corrosion-suspected spots. Of the corrosion -suspected spots analyzed by combined SEM and EDS, 44.14% and 6.90% remained corrosion -suspected on used and new brackets, respectively. Conclusions: Used brackets showed more signs of corrosion than new ones. Combined assessment of SEM and EDS indicates that the bracket surface is affected during orthodontic treatment as a result of corrosion. (Angle Orthod. 2022;92:661-668.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据