4.8 Article

Spatiotemporal Release of Reactive Oxygen Species and NO for Overcoming Biofilm Heterogeneity

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202202559

关键词

Biofilms; Drug Design; Heterogeneity; Pharmacokinetic Complementarity; Yolk-Shell Nanoplatform

资金

  1. New Direction Award of Institute of Process Equipment [109200 542810/067/005]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [109209*17221012001, 2 2050205 20 489]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22177114]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [YJKYYQ20210010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterogeneity in biofilms is a major challenge in biofilm therapies. This study presents a therapeutic strategy that overcomes biofilm heterogeneity by separately loading an antibacterial agent and an EPS dispersant in different compartments of a yolk-shell nanoplatform. The strategy takes advantage of the pharmacokinetic complementarity of ROS and NO to penetrate the biofilm and eliminate bacteria.
The heterogeneity in biofilms is a major challenge in biofilm therapies due to different susceptibility of bacteria and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) to antibacterial agents. Here, we describe a therapeutic strategy that overcame biofilm heterogeneity, where antibacterial agent (NO) and EPS dispersant (reactive oxygen species (ROS)-inducing Fe3+) were separately loaded in the yolk and shell compartment of a yolk-shell nanoplatform. Compared with traditional combinational chemotherapies which suffer from inconsistent pharmacokinetics profiles, this strategy drew on the pharmacokinetic complementarity of ROS and NO, where ROS with a short diffusion distance and a high redox potential corrupted the EPS, facilitating NO, which has a long diffusion distance and a broad antimicrobial spectrum, to penetrate the biofilm and eliminate the resident bacteria. Additionally, the construction of a three-dimensional spherical biofilm model is novel and clinically relevant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据